Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 79.8. Although the Galaxy Fold is incredibly heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, it's thinner and also newer. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen density and a way better 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. Xperia XZ Premium captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a bigger sensor and a much better 19 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.