Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Xperia XZ Premium, getting a 98.9 score against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is notably newer than Xperia XZ Premium's, although it is a bit heavier and a little thicker. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2160 x 3840 resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments, a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a much better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.