Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 801 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ Premium's general score of 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is incredibly newer, but way heavier and noticeably thicker than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a greater display density, a little bit larger display and a lot higher 2160 x 3840px resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processor than Xperia XZ Premium. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.