Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Xperia XZ Premium, with an 88.5 score against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a a lot newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xperia XZ Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a much better 2160 x 3840px resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3230mAh. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.