Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ Premium's 79.8 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a way better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a much greater pixel quantity per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. The Xperia XZ Premium has a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better 19 mega pixels resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit longer battery duration than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.