Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Xperia XZ Premium, getting a 90.6 score against 79.8. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot heavier than the Xperia XZ Premium, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a way higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 36 percent more battery size. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.