Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-10-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ's overall score of 73.5. Google Pixel 3 is a notably newer phone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a little higher pixel number in each screen inch, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Xperia XZ shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xperia XZ also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Sony Xperia XZ counts with a better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 3 features a battery duration that's just as good as Xperia XZ's battery lifetime, although the Google Pixel 3 also has 2915mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.