Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ, having a general score of 82.7 against 73.5. LG G8X ThinQ's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than Sony Xperia XZ. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better processor than Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has a little lower pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger screen. Xperia XZ shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Xperia XZ also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than Xperia XZ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.