Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 has an overall score of 76.7, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ's score of 73.5. Even though LG Stylo 6 is notably newer than Xperia XZ, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. LG Stylo 6 features a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
LG Stylo 6 has a display that is just as good as the Xperia XZ one, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The LG Stylo 6 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xperia XZ takes much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
LG Stylo 6 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.