Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ's 73.5 score. The LG V40 ThinQ is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner device than Sony Xperia XZ, but it's a little bit heavier. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a bigger display, a higher display density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V40 ThinQ has a much greater memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Sony Xperia XZ shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a way tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery duration than Xperia XZ, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.