Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Xperia XZ, with a global score of 87.6 against 73.5. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is much newer than Xperia XZ's, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Sony Xperia XZ and LG V60 ThinQ have very similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit inferior pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a way bigger display.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The Xperia XZ has just a bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower 23 mega pixels resolution camera, a much lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in low-light situations.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than Sony Xperia XZ, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.