Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Sony Xperia XZ, getting a general score of 87.1 against 73.5. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than Sony Xperia XZ, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Sony Xperia XZ counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less cpu cores and 9 GB lesser RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Xperia XZ, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures better videos and photos than Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video, a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way more MP camera in the back and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ, because it has a 55% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.