Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power has a general score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ's 73.5 global score. The Moto G Power body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Sony Xperia XZ. The Moto G Power features a bit faster processing unit than Xperia XZ, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ features a bit better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixel density. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. Sony Xperia XZ captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Sony Xperia XZ also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Moto G Power is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.