Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Xperia XZ, with a global score of 87 against 73.5. The Motorola razr (2020) body is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner than Xperia XZ's, although it is heavier. Sony Xperia XZ features a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processor than Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better storage for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Sony Xperia XZ features a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 2900mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Sony Xperia XZ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Sony Xperia XZ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Sony Xperia XZ, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.