Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZ's global score of 73.5. Nokia XR20's design is notably newer, but noticeably heavier and notably thicker than Xperia XZ. The Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better looking display than Xperia XZ, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger display.
The Nokia XR20 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Nokia XR20 has a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity. Nokia XR20 captures slightly better photos and videos than Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same video quality and the same sensor size, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia XZ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia XZ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xperia XZ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.