Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s has a global score of 77, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ's overall score of 73.5. Galaxy A20s's body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner than Xperia XZ's, but it is heavier. Xperia XZ counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A20s and Sony Xperia XZ count with similar processors, although the Galaxy A20s also has a higher number of cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A20s features a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ, because it has a 38% greater battery size. The Xperia XZ captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.