Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than Xperia XZ's 73.5 global score. Galaxy A25 5G's design is incredibly newer than Xperia XZ's, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better screen than Xperia XZ, because although it has a quite inferior pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen.
Xperia XZ counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.