Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-10-02 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is better than Sony Xperia XZ, getting a global score of 82.9 against 73.5. The Galaxy A34 construction is notably thinner and notably lighter than Sony Xperia XZ. The Galaxy A34 features just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Sony Xperia XZ and the Samsung Galaxy A34 count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A34 has a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Sony Xperia XZ features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos and a way worse 23 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Xperia XZ has more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A34, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB. The Galaxy A34 features a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.