Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than the Sony Xperia XZ, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy A50s is a bit heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ, it's a bit thinner and also newer. The Sony Xperia XZ and the Samsung Galaxy A50s both feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A50s captures better videos and photos than Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.