Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-10-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Xperia XZ, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a much newer cellphone than the Xperia XZ, although it is a bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 and Xperia XZ count with extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Sony Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much better 64 MP resolution camera, a much bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A52 features a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a 55% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.