Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Xperia XZ, having a 92.9 score against 73.5. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is extremely newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the Xperia XZ. The Sony Xperia XZ and the Galaxy A71 5G UW both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the Xperia XZ, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.