Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ's global score of 73.5. Galaxy F62's body is extremely newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Sony Xperia XZ. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better screen than Xperia XZ, because although it has a little bit lower pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XZ, and although they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy F62 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 shoots better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a way bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ, because it has a 141 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.