Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is better than Xperia XZ's 73.5 overall score. Despite being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier device than the Xperia XZ. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Xperia XZ, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM and 4 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also has an extra graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better screen than Xperia XZ, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bigger display. Xperia XZ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xperia XZ also has a much bigger back camera sensor, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 192 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit longer battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.