Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2016-10-02 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy On7 Prime is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ, getting a 76.9 score against 73.5. Galaxy On7 Prime's design is newer and a little thinner than Sony Xperia XZ's, but it's also a bit heavier. The Xperia XZ has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Xperia XZ also counts with a quite better display density.
The Xperia XZ has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has 4 less CPU cores (but faster) and less RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera, a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB, the Galaxy On7 Prime also has 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy On7 Prime counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xperia XZ, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.