Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a lot better than Xperia XZ, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 73.5. The Galaxy S10 body is noticeably newer, a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xperia XZ. Galaxy S10 features a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bigger display.
Galaxy S10 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 has a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Sony Xperia XZ has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low-light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.