Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than Sony Xperia XZ, having an 86.3 score against 73.5. Galaxy S10e is a way newer device, and it is also a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than Sony Xperia XZ. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little better performance than Xperia XZ, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better screen than Xperia XZ, because it has a quite better pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. The Xperia XZ shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia XZ also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10e features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e features a bit superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than Xperia XZ, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.