Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Xperia XZ, getting a score of 98 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is notably newer than the Xperia XZ's, but it is much heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking display than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a just a little better number of pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a lot larger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZ, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.