Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ, having a general score of 95.4 against 73.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is extremely newer than the Sony Xperia XZ, it is incredibly heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better display than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a much larger screen, a bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Xperia XZ, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better low light images, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZ, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.