Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-02 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Xperia XZ, having a 90.7 score against 73.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and much thinner device than the Xperia XZ. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a really larger screen, a just a little better pixel density and a lot higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xperia XZ has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores (but faster).
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a way better 200 mega pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture and a way better video quality. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.