Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ, with a overall score of 80.1 against 73.5. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably newer phone than the Sony Xperia XZ, although it is a lot thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Sony Xperia XZ captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 23 mega-pixels resolution, a larger sensor and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much longer battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Sony Xperia XZ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Sony Xperia XZ, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.