Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2017-10-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's 74.6 general score. Even though iPhone X and the Xperia XZ1 Compact were released only 1 months apart, the iPhone X construction is somewhat thinner but heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact. IPhone X counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X counts with a sharper display than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much better resolution of 1125 x 2436, a larger screen and a greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact shoots slightly better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Apple iPhone X has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. IPhone X features just a bit better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 1 percent more battery size.
Apple iPhone X is way more expensive than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.