Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is much better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's 74.6 score. The LG K92 design is newer and thinner than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's, but it is incredibly heavier. Xperia XZ1 Compact features a little better processing power than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG K92 features a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a really bigger screen and a quite higher number of pixels per display inch. The LG K92 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
LG K92 shoots better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments, a lot better resolution camera and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
LG K92 features a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG K92 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.