Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 has an overall score of 76.7, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's general score of 74.6. Even though LG Stylo 6 is noticeably heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's a bit thinner and way newer. The Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact features a little better processing power than LG Stylo 6. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
LG Stylo 6 features a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a way larger screen. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG Stylo 6 features a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 48 percent more battery capacity. Xperia XZ1 Compact counts with a better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a way better (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Stylo 6 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.