Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-10-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, with an 81.3 score against 74.6. Although the LG V35 ThinQ and Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact were only released with a couple of months difference, the LG V35 ThinQ construction is a little heavier but much thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a really larger display, a lot higher count of pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia XZ1 Compact has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xperia XZ1 Compact also counts with a more megapixels back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.