Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a global score of 87.6 against 74.6. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is a lot newer and a little thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact's, but it's also noticeably heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a little greater pixels density, a way larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ's camera is very similar to the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact one, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.