Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact's score of 74.6. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly heavier than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's a little bit thinner and also much newer. Xperia XZ1 Compact has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a way larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rate, a way more MP back-facing camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.