Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a little bit better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, with a score of 77.4 against 74.6. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner than Xperia XZ1 Compact's, although it's extremely heavier. Galaxy A15 5G has a sharper screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a way larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Xperia XZ1 Compact has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy A15 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Galaxy A15 5G features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A15 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.