Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, with a 79.9 score against 74.6. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a bit better pixels density, a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a much bigger screen.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A25 5G takes clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a larger aperture.
Galaxy A25 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. The Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has an 85 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.