Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a general score of 90.8 against 74.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is notably newer and just a little thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact. The Xperia XZ1 Compact counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a greater display pixels density, a much bigger display and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G takes much better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a much higher resolution camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.