Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a 91.3 score against 74.6. The Galaxy A52 5G is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner device than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, although it's also way heavier. The Galaxy A52 5G has a little more vivid display than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much larger display, more pixels per display inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact has a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures much better photos and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a larger camera aperture and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.