Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a score of 98.9 against 74.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is extremely heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's thinner and also much newer. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a way larger display, a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a lot greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processor than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light situations, a much higher video quality, a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.