Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-10-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, having an 86.3 score against 74.6. The Galaxy S10e design is newer and thinner than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's, but it's a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10e counts with better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 3100mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh. Xperia XZ1 Compact captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ1 Compact also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10e is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.