Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, getting a overall score of 98 against 74.6. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is noticeably heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's a little thinner and also extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better display than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, way more pixels per display inch and a lot larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater photographs and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a much higher video quality and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than Xperia XZ1 Compact, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.