Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-01 | -- |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's overall score of 74.6. Galaxy S25's body is lighter and much thinner than Xperia XZ1 Compact. The Galaxy S25 features a way better looking display than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a lot bigger display and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features more memory to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xperia XZ1 Compact has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 features a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 48% greater battery size. The Galaxy S25 captures way better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light situations, a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S25 costs more money than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.