Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 319 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's global score of 74.6. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much newer than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's a lot heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a more vivid display than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560, a bit larger screen and a way better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processing unit than Xperia XZ1 Compact. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.