Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, with a 92.3 score against 74.6. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is incredibly heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's noticeably thinner and much newer. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a better pixels number per display inch.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features improved battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit more expensive than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.