Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Xperia XZ1 Compact's global score of 74.6. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, although it is also a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processing unit than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has a worse video definition and a camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a larger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.