Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is a bit better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, getting a global score of 78.2 against 74.6. The Xiaomi Poco M3 body is way newer than the Xperia XZ1 Compact's, although it's just a bit thicker and way heavier. The Xperia XZ1 Compact has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a really larger display. The Xiaomi Poco M3 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a lot better resolution back camera, a larger aperture and a larger sensor.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way better battery duration than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.