Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a bit better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, getting a 78.2 score against 74.6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's design is extremely newer and thinner, but noticeably heavier than Xperia XZ1 Compact. The Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better screen than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much bigger display, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better pixel density. The Xperia XZ1 Compact shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller camera aperture and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better battery life than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.