Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's general score of 79. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is newer and notably thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it's also noticeably heavier.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a little better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a lower number of cores, and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro Max and Xperia XZ2 Compact both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the iPhone 11 Pro Max has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen, a quite more brightness and a better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 400 GB. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3969mAh battery size.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.